1979 Ford Mustang

13 Disappointing Muscle Cars That Failed to Live Up to Hype

Many of us love a classic American muscle car. These are some of the most iconic automobiles in history, with names such as Mustang, Challenger, and Superbird among the best.

Despite the success of the muscle car, not all of them have been the greatest of successes. Several muscle cars have sadly fallen flat.

This list contains some of the most disappointing of all muscle cars, ones that missed the mark and failed to live up to our expectations due to poor performance and unreliability.

Ford Mustang II

1974 Ford Mustang II Coupe
Image Credit: biglinc71/WikiCommons.

In 1964, Ford launched the Mustang to much fanfare, and it achieved great success across its first generation. Following that success, Blue Oval launched the Mustang II in 1973 and produced the second-generation Mustang until 1978.

Yet, for many, the Mustang II was a massive disappointment compared to the first generation. Solid sales and good marketing hid the fact that enthusiasts felt it abandoned essential ingredients of the muscle car recipe. For example, there was no V8 engine option when it first launched, and when the V8 did come for the second model year, it only had 140 hp. The design of the Mustang II also failed to resonate with consumers.

1980 Ford Mustang

1979 Ford Mustang
Image Credit: Jiří Sedláček – CC BY-SA 4.0/ WikiCommons

Ford followed on from the initial disappointment of the Mustang II with another equally disappointing muscle car. Launched for the 1979 model year, the early version of the Fox-Body Mustang was a massive letdown, highlighted by the 1980 model specifically.

The base 1980 Mustang had a 2.3-liter four-cylinder under the hood, producing just 88 hp and 119 lb-ft of torque and lackluster acceleration. The styling was more family sedan than American muscle car, and it did little to help the Mustang’s reputation after the second-generation’s issues.

1982 Chevrolet Camaro Iron Duke

1982 Chevrolet Camaro Iron Duke
Image Credit: Mecum Auctions.

The 1980s were a mainly fallow period for muscle cars. The gas crises of the 1970s had hurt them in the long run, and the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro Iron Duke perfectly sums it up.

Under the hood of the Camaro Iron Duke was a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, and Time magazine described it as the “smallest, least powerful, most un-Camaro-like engine that could be.” They had a point, too, as the small powertrain produced just 80 hp, and the 0-60 mph time was also a letdown of around 20 seconds. Not the Camaro’s finest hour.

1977 Chevrolet Monza Mirage

1977 Chevrolet Monza Mirage
Image Credit: Hemmings.

On the face of it, the Chevrolet Monza Mirage has a lot going for it. It has a great paint job, an evocative name, and some good styling. Yet beneath all this, it was a muscle car with less than 150 hp.

Chevrolet commissioned Michigan Auto Technologies to turn the Monza Mirage into a muscle car. Yet they ended up missing the mark entirely. The Monza Mirage had a small 305 ci powertrain under the hood, producing just 145 hp. Sales were as slow as you would expect, and in the end, Chevrolet produced just 4,000 examples of the Monza Mirage.

Third-Generation Chevrolet Camaro

1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
Image Credit: GPS 56/WikiCommons.

While we have discussed the 1982 Camaro Iron Duke, the Camaros of the 1980s deserve an entry all of their own. While the third-generation was widely praised for its new styling, the performance was one area that didn’t earn the plaudits.

The base 2.5-liter four-cylinder was particularly uninspiring, but you would expect adding a 5.0-liter LG4 4-bbl V8 to increase the power tenfold. Sadly, that was not the case, as the large V8 produced just 145 hp, which was as much as some family cars could make at the time. The early 1980s was a particular nadir for the muscle car.

1984 Mercury Cougar XR7

1984 Mercury Cougar XR7
Image Credit: Exotic Motor Cars.

The 1984 Mercury Cougar XR7 was still a poor product, but it at least signaled that muscle cars might be on the up again. Under the hood, the Cougar XR7 had a 145-hp turbocharged four-cylinder engine, much better than the 117-hp Mercury Capri RS Turbo.

While 145 hp wasn’t massive, it came from a four-cylinder engine, not a big V8. Hinting that future muscle cars might bring back the power levels we saw in the 1960s and early 1970s. So, the Cougar XR7 was not a great muscle car, but it was a sign things were heading in the right direction. 

1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo

1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
Image Credit: Taxiguy57 – Public Domain/WikiCommons

In the mid-1990s, Chevrolet wanted to add something extra to its muscle car range. So, it introduced the Monte Carlo and hoped that this would help us forget the errors it had made with the early 1980s Camaros.

Sadly, it made similar errors. Under the hood, a 3.1-liter V6 produced just 160 hp and 185 lb-ft of torque. An upgrade to the 3.4-liter V6 produced a slightly better 210 hp and 215 lb-ft of torque, but it was still some way short of what muscle car fans wanted. 

1982 Dodge Challenger

1982 Dodge Challenger
Image Credit: GalantFan/WikiCommons

In the early 1980s, Dodge decided it was the right time to bring the Challenger back into its lineup. Sadly, it was doing so after the gas crises of the 1970s, which hampered the performance levels of muscle cars.

As a result, the second-generation Dodge Challenger was nothing more than a Mitsubishi Galant with a new name and Dodge logo slapped onto it. Power was feeble, with a 1.6-liter or 2.6-liter four-cylinder available, with the 2.6-liter engine producing just 100 hp and 137 lb-ft of torque. Unsurprisingly, the Challenger died once again for the 1983 model year.

1981 Mercury Capri RS Turbo

Mercury Capri RS
Image Credit: Jacob Frey 4A – CC BY 2.0/WikiCommons

On the face of it, the 1981 Mercury Capri RS Turbo has something going for it. It was a decent-looking muscle car that was effectively Mercury’s version of the Mustang, but as its presence on this list indicates, it had its problems.

While the bulging hood and body-color exterior accents suggest big performance, the reality is the 2.3-liter turbocharged engine under the hood produces just 117 hp and 135 lb-ft of torque. It took until the Ford Special Vehicle Operations division got their hands on the engine for it to make a solid 205 hp in the Mustang SVO.

1980 Plymouth Volare Road Runner

1980 Plymouth Volare Road Runner
Image Credit: Greg Gjerdingen/WikiCommons.

Following the terrible revival of the Challenger, Chrysler decided to revive another muscle car in the 1980s. Enter the 1980 Plymouth Volare Road Runner, a horrible way for such an iconic name to return.

A large 5.2-liter engine with a two-barrel carburetor suggests plenty of power, so imagine how good the four-barrel version was. Sadly, the 5.2-liter two-barrel carb produced just 120 hp and 245 lb-ft of torque. As you would expect, the four-barrel did little to boost power, making just 155 hp and 240 lb-ft of torque, so it had more power but less torque.

1980 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta

1980 Chevrolet Camaro
Image Credit:Firing up the quattro – CC BY 2.0/WikiCommons

The 1980 Camaro Berlinetta is one of the more obscure versions of the Chevrolet Camaro. It is also among the rarest, as Chevrolet produced only a handful. Yet that rarity couldn’t hide the fact that they had an underwhelming performance.

The fact it is an early 1980s Camaro should be a warning sign to any avid collectors. Under the hood sits a 305 ci 5.0-liter LG4 V8, yet this large engine produces just 155 hp. Once again, the tightening of emissions regulations following the oil and gas crises of the 1970s hampered what manufacturers could do with their muscle cars. The saving grace of the Camaro Belinetta is that it is pretty good-looking.

1982 Ford Thunderbird

1982 Ford Thunderbird
Image Credit: That Hartford Guy/WikiCommons.

The original Ford Thunderbird of the 1950s was a classic, so Ford decided that the best thing it could do in the 1980s was to try to make it even better. But they badly missed the mark regarding the short-lived Thunderbird of 1980-1982.

The Ford icon had grown massively, changing from a sleek, stylish muscle car into something more like an average family sedan. It might have had a 4.7-liter V8 engine under the hood, but that only produced 120 hp and 205 lb-ft of torque—nowhere near the level you would expect from a Ford muscle car. The size of the car didn’t help matters, and it was to some relief that Ford dropped this Thunderbird in 1982.

2015 Ford Mustang GT

2015 Ford Mustang GT
Image Credit: Sicnag/WikiCommons.

We now have a muscle car that is not let down by its poor performance. However, the 2015 Ford Mustang GT has more significant issues. A look at Vehicle History reveals that the 2015 Mustang GT suffers from paint peeling and damage to the exterior of the muscle car.

After just 30,000 miles, owners have reported paint peeling off the car and ruining the Mustang’s appearance. This has the knock-on effect of adding to the owner’s repair bills, so an annual service could become increasingly expensive as you look to restore the paint. Issues like this hinder what is one of the best Mustangs of the 21st century.

Henry Kelsall

Author: Henry Kelsall

Title: Writer

Bio:

Henry has freelanced for over eight years now, mostly in automotive matters, but he has also dabbled in other forms of writing too. He has a lot of love for Japanese classics and American muscle cars, in particular the Honda NSX and first-generation Ford Mustang. When not writing, Henry is often found at classic car events or watching motorsports at home, but he also has a curious passion for steam trains.

Similar Posts